Why is vaporising used instead of smoking?

This is one of the few places in this field where the evidence points clearly in one direction. Burning anything and inhaling the smoke is harmful, the harm is avoidable, and avoiding it changes nothing about the therapeutic effect.

The short answer

  • Combustion is the problem, not inhalation itself.
  • Smoke contains tar, carbon monoxide and carcinogens that serve no therapeutic purpose.
  • Vaporising heats without burning, releasing the active compounds at a lower temperature.
  • Vaporising is not risk-free. Airway irritation and cough still occur.
  • Mixing with tobacco adds nicotine dependence and the full range of smoking harms.

What actually differs

Burning plant material at high temperature breaks compounds down and creates new ones. Vaporising heats it enough to release the active compounds as a vapour without reaching combustion.

The products of combustion — tar, carbon monoxide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other irritants — are the same class of substances that cause harm in tobacco smoking. They contribute nothing to the therapeutic effect. Avoiding them costs nothing clinically.

Vaporising also gives more consistent delivery, which matters when the aim is to find a reproducible dose rather than an effect.

What vaporising does not fix

It reduces one category of harm. It does not make inhalation harmless and it does not change anything about the cannabinoids themselves.

Where an inhaled route does not suit, other routes are available and are covered in What forms do cannabis-based medicines come in?

The tobacco question

Mixing cannabis with tobacco remains common in the UK and is worth raising explicitly, because it changes the risk picture substantially.

It introduces nicotine dependence, which makes stopping harder, and adds the cardiovascular and cancer risks of tobacco smoking. Someone who has been using illicit cannabis this way and moves to a prescribed vaporised route is making a meaningful reduction in harm.

Prescribers ask about this. Answer honestly — the point is to get the treatment right, and a history of tobacco use changes the advice you should be given.

If you want to stop smoking, NHS stop smoking services are free and are more effective than going it alone.

Frequently asked questions

Why is vaporising preferred to smoking?

Because combustion produces tar, carbon monoxide and carcinogens that contribute nothing therapeutic. Vaporising heats the material enough to release the active compounds without burning it, avoiding that category of harm entirely.

Is vaporising safe?

It is less harmful than smoking, not harmless. Airway irritation and cough are common, the long-term effects of habitual vapour inhalation are not fully characterised, and the risks of the cannabinoids themselves are unchanged.

Can I smoke my prescribed medicine instead?

It is not how these medicines are intended to be used, and doing so adds avoidable harm with no therapeutic gain. Discuss it with your prescriber rather than deciding alone.

What if I currently mix cannabis with tobacco?

Tell your prescriber. It adds nicotine dependence and the full range of smoking-related harms, and it changes the advice you should be given. NHS stop smoking services are free.

Sources and further reading

Every factual statement on this page is drawn from the following public sources. Links open in a new tab and are not affiliated with Flora House.

  1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research (2017)
  2. NHS: Better Health — Quit smoking
  3. NICE guideline NG144: Cannabis-based medicinal products
  4. NHS: Medical cannabis (and cannabis oils)
  5. MHRA: The supply, manufacture, importation and distribution of unlicensed cannabis-based products for medicinal use

Patient guide · Written by the Flora House editorial team · Last reviewed: 8 September 2026